2.1 KiB
Release review
What was checked
- The host archive contains the two expected sibling projects:
OmniSocketGo_add_cameraandrobot-command-center. - The robot archive is a direct V4L2 implementation. Its source, scripts,
and camera-device discovery remain under
robot/v4l2/. - The ROS 2 variant is kept separate under
robot/ros2/; it uses the ROS 2 camera bridge and shared-memory hand-off instead of opening the same V4L2 node in the default path. - The network guide describes both direct-LAN and one-public-KCP-Hub modes.
Both sides must use the same Hub address and leave
relay_viaempty for the one-Hub topology. - Nested release archives, Python caches, frontend dependencies, generated
build output, and
*.env.localmachine overrides were excluded from the repository. No credential assignment or private-key material was found in the source scan.
Important configuration boundary
The checked-in *.env files are templates and contain example deployment
values. The original guide also contains the LAN address and Linux paths from
the validation machine (192.168.41.144 and /home/ps/Desktop). Treat those
values as examples: copy the templates to ignored *.env.local files and
replace the address, install root, camera device, and ROS user for the target
machine.
Validation boundary
The C transport and the ROS 2 package are Linux-targeted. A complete build and camera smoke test must run on the target Linux host/ARM64 robot. The ROS 2 variant was previously built and exercised on the robot; this Windows checkout only performs source/layout, archive/hash, and sensitive-file checks.
Runtime choice
Use exactly one of the robot releases per robot process:
direct V4L2: robot/v4l2/OmniSocketGo_robot
ROS 2: robot/ros2/OmniSocketGo_robot_ros
The V4L2 path requires exclusive access to its /dev/video* node. The ROS 2
path requires the Orbbec/proc_manager and bridge path to be running and keeps
those services as the camera owner. Starting both paths creates duplicate
capture/peer processes and is unsupported.